We should - it's called Global Extortionism. It's a political battle that is fought by the military. It's winable (Just like Iraq) but the polit-buts don't want to do it expeditiously - no nukes, but we have the means and wherewithall to get it done, quickly, efficently, finally. All of that has been discussed above.
And I agree, we need to wrap this up and bring the troops home. But quiting now will not have acomplished anything. Like Viet Nam (been there-did that), that was an ugly place back then and we had people at home that didn't support it so the polit-buts tried to run it. When they did that, they left the military out of the planning process and more troopes died. And we had some very famous persons mixed up with that crap (Jane Fonda - aka: Hanoi Jane, John Kerry aka: JFK (wanna-be), John Walker aka: Russian stooge that sold out hundreds of pilots so the North could shoot'm down; and thousands of others).
"Been there did that ..."
Grenada
Bosnia (x2)
Iraq? (x3)
An a bunch of other 3RD world brush fires that the US entered to stop wholesale slaughter of innocents...
Define sensless? Isolationism??
The Monroe Doctrine is dead and burried.
We live in a global community now and "evil doers" are being exposed more readily because we still have a 1st Amendment that allows them to make media headlines. Should we stand by and let that happen? NO. Should we focus more attention on American problems YES. so it's a political trade off.
I'm curious to hear your thoughts and basis.
Mudrat
mudgirl wroteI support our troops but hell if i'm going to support a war that shouldn't have been started in the first place... Are we going to start shit with North Korea now? Hopefully this will all end before more of our countries young men have to die for a senseless cause.